Page 44 of 56 FirstFirst ... 2434394041424344454647484954 ... LastLast
Results 431 to 440 of 560

Thread: WWE/WWF/TNA/Wrestling discussion thread - (may contain spoilers!!!)

  1. #431
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,183

    Default

    Wendy Richter was bigger than Hogan in her prime (1984-1985).
    You guys must be too young to remember that far back. :P

  2. #432
    Join Date
    28th Dec 2007
    Location
    Ulladulla
    Posts
    5,294

    Default

    No I remember Wendi Richter in her prime but like now I've never been a fan of female wrestling. I was a fan of the mass of tag teams in the early-mid 80's in the WWF. Brittish Bulldogs and U.S Express were particular favourites.

    Naturally I didn't like The Dream Team
    HATRED FOR JAMES VAN DER BEEK RISING!

    Still have some stuff for sale. Free pickup at Parra Fair
    http://www.otca.com.au/boards/showthread.php?t=8503

  3. #433
    Join Date
    2nd Mar 2010
    Location
    Dapto
    Posts
    12,777

    Default

    I was born in 85.
    I started watching wrestling in the early 90s and damn got into it after King of The Ring '96.

  4. #434
    Join Date
    26th Nov 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    2,821

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Demonac View Post
    Wendy Richter was bigger than Hogan in her prime (1984-1985).
    You guys must be too young to remember that far back. :P
    Maybe but he was bigger in his prime!

  5. #435
    Join Date
    17th Aug 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    794

    Default WWE/WWF/TNA/Wrestling discussion thread - (may contain spoilers!!!)

    After the few years of being on these boards, I've noticed no thread on WWE or wrestling in general? C'mon guys, I can't be the only one. Don't be embarrassed to admit that you follow!

    I was at Wrestlemania XXX in New Orleans this year. Awesome experience!

  6. #436
    Join Date
    7th Feb 2013
    Location
    2164
    Posts
    8,925

    Default

    Pfft. They threw Taker's legacy out the door by getting him to job to that kumquat , Lesner.

  7. #437
    Join Date
    17th Aug 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    794

    Default

    Still not clear who's decision it was to end the streak though. Not sure if Taker's or Vince...?

  8. #438
    Join Date
    26th Apr 2009
    Location
    Paasu
    Posts
    1,256

    Default

    is jericho back? he's the only reason for me to watch wrestling. I love that he brought back his lion tamer near the end of his last run.

  9. #439
    Join Date
    7th Feb 2013
    Location
    2164
    Posts
    8,925

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ITZTRU View Post
    Still not clear who's decision it was to end the streak though. Not sure if Taker's or Vince...?
    I'd say it was Vince's to further push Lesner -what's better than defeating the man who was 21-0 on the biggest stage of them all? Ive been a lifelong fan & to see his streak come to an end was dissapointing to say the least

  10. #440
    Join Date
    17th Aug 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    794

    Default

    There are hints of Jericho's return but it will only be to further push talent. Not for any kind if title run I don't imagine.

    As for taker's streak - if you happened to watch WM XXX, the reaction of the crowd on TV does not nearly reflect the reaction of the crowd in the stadium that night. Hearing 3/4 of the crowd in the arena turn silent and the amount of jaws you could just about hear dropping to the ground was surreal.

    Still. As much as I like Lesnar, pushing Lesnar by giving up the streak doesn't make any sense and would be poor judgement on Vince's part if what you say/think is true. There are talks of taker actually wanting Lesnar to be the one to end the streak. If that's true, then who is anyone else to argue?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •