Page 30 of 57 FirstFirst ... 102025262728293031323334354050 ... LastLast
Results 291 to 300 of 567

Thread: Government to censor the Internet

  1. #291
    Join Date
    24th Nov 2009
    Location
    1984
    Posts
    8,244

    Default

    Communications Minister Senator Stephen Conroy has said that the filter will block only content that "you can't buy [on] DVD" or watch on TV.
    I'm assuming that this means 'released material only' not stuff that has yet to be shown or made available to purchase. This sucks for anyone wanting to catch-up on their favourite TV show when the networks here refuse to show it or give it a regular airtime.

    The government is really trying to control what we all watch and when aren't they. Sounds familiar to another country I know of...
    New Acquisitions:
    TR Astrotrain, Skullsmasher, & Hardhead
    Scouting For:
    G1 Boxes & Cardbacks
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
    [COLLECTION] [CREATIVE] [MK COLLECTION]



  2. #292
    Join Date
    2nd Mar 2010
    Location
    Dapto
    Posts
    12,777

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SGB View Post
    A win in the filter debate (for everybody) (poor article, IMO; once again, it's author shows a profound poor understanding of the issue)
    Your not wrong there SGB, the "Majority" of non-supporters will be satisfied with the RC Review? - Is Mr. Riley serious?

    Quote Originally Posted by SGB View Post
    Cyber Safety Committee censors Family Guy (I suspect Mark Newton was baiting the committee, and they fell for it, hook line and sinker)
    Gees, the amount of Stupidity that Governs our country is astounding...
    I wonder what they thought of the Drawn Together Movie.

  3. #293
    Join Date
    5th May 2008
    Location
    Clifton Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,275

    Default

    Every time I hear Conroy speak about this I always hear something like this in the background.

    Wonder why?
    |Buy ALL my things!|Collection Thread|Current Collection Count: ~661|
    |Wants|Galaxy Force Blue Rumble|

  4. #294
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

  5. #295
    Join Date
    19th Dec 2008
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    3,259

    Default Clever

    Quote Originally Posted by Hursticon View Post
    Your not wrong there SGB, the "Majority" of non-supporters will be satisfied with the RC Review? - Is Mr. Riley serious?
    It's a good if not very inventive move if you're pushing for a filter - claim a partial victory, misrepresent opponents' position and ignore the arguments against it, and marginalise those who are totally opposed as fringe extremists.
    Classic politics 101, Not Opting Into Child Porn Mark II but with a dash of subtlety. No one who's following the debate and knows the facts would fall for it, but that's not who the article would be targeted at.

  6. #296
    Join Date
    19th Dec 2008
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    3,259

    Default

    As a small thought, it's probably too late to get a net-roots party registered right? 'Cos a Melbourne-based "Anti-Child Porn Party" handing out How to Vote cards with Conroy last on the ballot might be a good idea. It's not like all of us don't know that the filter will, if anything, aid child pornographers by sweeping the issue under a rug rather than focussing on catching and jailing producers.
    You probably wouldn't even need to be a party, just an organisation calling yourself the Anti-Child Porn Alliance or Concerned Citizens Against Child Porn or something. There are enough techheads concerned about the filter to make the idea feasible.

    EDIT - It should totally be called the "Won't Somebody Please Think Of the Children? Party"
    Last edited by Ode to a Grasshopper; 17th July 2010 at 03:39 PM.

  7. #297
    Join Date
    29th Dec 2007
    Location
    NSW
    Posts
    14,762

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ode to a Grasshopper View Post
    As a small thought, it's probably too late to get a net-roots party registered right? 'Cos a Melbourne-based "Anti-Child Porn Party" handing out How to Vote cards with Conroy last on the ballot might be a good idea. It's not like all of us don't know that the filter will, if anything, aid child pornographers by sweeping the issue under a rug rather than focussing on catching and jailing producers.
    You probably wouldn't even need to be a party, just an organisation calling yourself the Anti-Child Porn Alliance or Concerned Citizens Against Child Porn or something. There are enough techheads concerned about the filter to make the idea feasible.
    It's true. To child pornographers, the filter is like the ultimate distraction tactic. The public thinks it's no longer happening because of the filter and the Government will stop any real effort in putting down child pornography because officially their filter should be doing the job.

    It's ridiculous.

  8. #298
    Join Date
    5th May 2008
    Location
    Clifton Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kup View Post
    It's true. To child pornographers, the filter is like the ultimate distraction tactic. The public thinks it's no longer happening because of the filter and the Government will stop any real effort in putting down child pornography because officially their filter should be doing the job.

    It's ridiculous.
    The other down side is that it gives parents a false sense of security. They will think the internet is a safe place when it really isn't. There is some really scary stuff out there.
    The kinda scary stuff that stops me from hitting the random page button on Encyclopaedia Dramatica
    |Buy ALL my things!|Collection Thread|Current Collection Count: ~661|
    |Wants|Galaxy Force Blue Rumble|

  9. #299
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Looks as if the Liberals are against the filter:

    http://noaustraliannetfiltering.blog...in-cairns.html

    I'll wait for official confirmation before getting too excited.

  10. #300
    Join Date
    5th May 2008
    Location
    Clifton Hill, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,275

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SGB View Post
    Looks as if the Liberals are against the filter:

    http://noaustraliannetfiltering.blog...in-cairns.html
    If I had been in their position I would have let it continue on and on, like they have, without giving my position on it until now. Now is the perfect time for them to make it an election issue.
    It might be shelved for 12 months, it is still there waiting to be brought in, they can now make a big fuss about it on the big stage and make it an election issue.
    Painting Labor as a censorship government like China's for an key issue would probably bring some votes their way
    |Buy ALL my things!|Collection Thread|Current Collection Count: ~661|
    |Wants|Galaxy Force Blue Rumble|

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •