Page 4 of 7 FirstFirst ... 23456 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 70

Thread: Govt wants ISPs to record browsing history

  1. #31
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

  2. #32
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

  3. #33
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

  4. #34
    Join Date
    30th Dec 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    5,089

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by fatbot View Post
    Which, due to preferences, the vote you cast goes to labour.
    Only if your to lazy to number all the boxes I thought

  5. #35
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

  6. #36
    Join Date
    2nd Mar 2010
    Location
    Dapto
    Posts
    12,777

    Default

    I like how the Attorney-General's Department expect the Industry to foot the bill for the retention of data and the process required in order to do so as well as the storage required .

    The whole "We want to make Internet use in Australia more secure, but... We want you to retain private information, pay for it, store it and manage it" statement is so rude and a joke!.

    I like how they don't want to spend any money on storing the retained data in a Government controlled central location, I agree in not keeping one's eggs in a single basket but I think they should at least play some sort of role seeming as it is their legislation that they want to introduce.

  7. #37
    SGB's Avatar
    SGB is offline Rank 1 - New or Inactive
    Join Date
    22nd Feb 2009
    Location
    Illawarra
    Posts
    1,113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Hursticon View Post
    I like how the Attorney-General's Department expect the Industry to foot the bill for the retention of data and the process required in order to do so as well as the storage required .
    Realistically, the industry wouldn't foot the bill, it'd be the consumers footing the bill through increased Internet access fees.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    2nd Mar 2010
    Location
    Dapto
    Posts
    12,777

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SGB View Post
    Realistically, the industry wouldn't foot the bill, it'd be the consumers footing the bill through increased Internet access fees.
    Agreed, but you know what I mean, it's like saying:
    "I wanna keep this MISB Fortress Maximus inside this perspex case but I want the members of OTCA to purchase the figure, the case and foot the bill for postage in order to keep the figure safe for the community".
    Why would anyone do either?, where's the incentive?.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    19th Dec 2008
    Location
    HK
    Posts
    3,259

    Default

    I think the trick is to make it illegal for the rest of OTCA not to foot the bill...

  10. #40
    Join Date
    2nd Mar 2010
    Location
    Dapto
    Posts
    12,777

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ode to a Grasshopper View Post
    I think the trick is to make it illegal for the rest of OTCA not to foot the bill...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •