
Originally Posted by
GoktimusPrime
So I had a chat with a dude who's a retired Sensei who's taught traditional Okinawan Karate for 30 years and asked him about his thoughts on GKR. He said that it is a massively huge club and the people there are really nice and it's a great social opportunity to make friends. He said that their point-sparring/tournament techniques are good (I've heard others say this too) and - as I've often said before - excellent for teaching martial arts novices. He totally agreed with me that it's a good style for someone to start in who has absolutely zero martial arts experience and/or underdeveloped coordination skills.
He then said that most of the people who train in GKR see it just as a 'fun hobby,' i.e. they don't take it very seriously as a fighting form. To them it's just something they do for fun and fitness, perhaps to win comps for sport fighting, but not actual combat fighting isn't something they think about. In that regard, he believes that GKR isn't ideal as an actual combat art because they train for tournament fighting with non-contact etc. - he also spoke about how, in his experience/observation, many GKR practioners lack a lot of basic traditional martial arts skills and make common mistakes like standing on their stances and not in them (he said that whenever he gave a GKR Karateka the "push test" they'd topple over quite easily), and lack the ability to drive any power behind their strikes -- which isn't surprising considering that they teach you to hold your strikes back (because of the non-contact rule) and teach you to punch in front of targets at not through them.
But he also said that this problem isn't unique to GKR - it occurs in a lot of martial arts schools, even many schools of traditional martial arts. And I must say that I do wholeheartedly agree with him there.