View Poll Results: Which poll options would you like to see for future collection polls?

Voters
20. You may not vote on this poll
  • Don't change it

    3 15.00%
  • Multiples of 200

    11 55.00%
  • Multiples of 300

    0 0%
  • Multiples of 400

    0 0%
  • Multiples of 500

    1 5.00%
  • Other (specify)

    5 25.00%
Results 1 to 10 of 25

Thread: Voting options for future collection polls

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    12th Jun 2011
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    6,558

    Default

    How many people really have large collections in excess of 1000? I don't think many of us have collections that are that big. I only have 303 toys in my collection and I think there will be a lot more like me and far fewer with over 1000.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by DELTAprime View Post
    How many people really have large collections in excess of 1000? I don't think many of us have collections that are that big. I only have 303 toys in my collection and I think there will be a lot more like me and far fewer with over 1000.
    19% of collectors surveyed have collections numbering 1000 or more.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    23rd Sep 2010
    Location
    Sydney
    Posts
    9,352

    Default

    Honestly have no Idea what numbers I have. When I was a youngun it was around 100, I stopped collecting for a long time and started back up with Alternators/Binaltech then Generations and the Movies, animated and prime. so probably close to 1000.

    perhaps increments of 150 or 200.
    The problem with this is we then lose resolution in the data.
    Why bother limiting ourselves to other threads, if we have 15 increments and somewhere else has 10 and we need to compare, just fit out 15 increments into their 10.
    My Fan interview with Big Trev

    my original collection from when I was more impressionable.
    My Current Collection Pics (Changing on occasion)

  4. #4
    Join Date
    12th Jun 2011
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    6,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    19% of collectors surveyed have collections numbering 1000 or more.
    That means that 81% have less than 1000 and looks like over 75% have 500 or less. More people have smaller collections. If you really want to increase the limit then maybe try something like.

    100 / 200 / 300 / 400 / 500 / 750 / 1000 / 1250 / 1500 / 2000

  5. #5
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    First of all, I've stopped doing the annual collection count survey poll since 2011. Pretty much other boards aren't interested in participating any more, unless we wanna still do it just for OTCA. <shrugs>

    Secondly, even if we wanted to continue this project, changing the increments would render the results incomparable with previous years. The results that I showed you in my last posted represents the average of results gathered between the years of 2007 to 2011. If we were to conduct a poll this month for 2013 and we used the increments that you're suggesting then I would be unable to include results for anything above 500 into that of previous years.

    But don't forget that from 2009 to 2011 we did have secondary polls for people with collections number 100 or less and 1000 and over - represented thusly:


  6. #6
    Join Date
    7th Feb 2013
    Location
    2164
    Posts
    8,925

    Default

    5500 TF? Wow...
    You'd need a hangar to store it all

  7. #7
    Join Date
    27th Dec 2007
    Location
    Sydney NSW
    Posts
    37,780

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Sinnertwin View Post
    5500 TF? Wow...
    You'd need a hangar to store it all
    Noone voted above 3500, but I just put that option there because in the future we could very well have collections that large. In 1985 I thought owning 50 Transformers was already a big accomplishment - the idea of owning hundreds or thousands would've been inconceivable.

    We're gonna need Tardises to store our collections one day.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    12th Jun 2011
    Location
    Gladstone
    Posts
    6,558

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by GoktimusPrime View Post
    But don't forget that from 2009 to 2011 we did have secondary polls for people with collections number 100 or less and 1000 and over - represented thusly:
    In that case there is no need to change the poll. Just do a secondary poll like you have done in the past for people over 1000.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •