I, and the TF Wiki disagree. Gestalts are a SUBSET of Combiners.
Actually, I interpreted Gok's imagery and comments as him saying that the other posts here that refer to Superion or Bruticus as a "Combiner" are incorrect, as they should be referred to as "Gestalts".
I also interpreted gok as saying they were different, which I disagree, as one is a subset of the other.
How did you interpret it?
Moreover, Gok, what did you mean?
I interpreted it exactly as his pictures.
You realise the top two form things right? A camera and a ship, and the bottom ones form a whole new robot.
Combiner, Gesault. Not a hard nut to crack.![]()
Code:O o _ / -------------------------------- | IMMA FIRIN MA LAZAR!!! \_--------------------------------
There is a difference. I can't believe I have to use your own evidence against you.
Ok, combiners:
Combiner
As above, a member of a group of Transformers who assemble into a composite form. Also refers to that composite form itself.
EG: Reflector.
Gesaults:
Gestalt
Fan-terminology for a certain class of combiners -- generally used only for "big robot" combiners with emergent personalities.
EG: Devastator.
I hope that puts us on the same page now.
But, personally I call them combiners no matter what. That is my personal belief, if they combine, well, they are combiners.![]()
Code:O o _ / -------------------------------- | IMMA FIRIN MA LAZAR!!! \_--------------------------------
OK, but you have to promise me... this is the last time
Gestalt
Fan-terminology for a certain class of combiners
EG: Bruticus or Superion
Combiner
As above, a member of a group of Transformers who assemble into a composite form.
EG: Bruticus or Superion
While Gestalt is a fine term to use to refer to Bruticus or Superion, SO IS "Combiner"!
Subset. Subset! Say it..... Subset!
Now leave me alone and let Gok speak for himself.