-
14th December 2014, 05:03 PM
#27
I still disagree is a logo, this is like Apple patent right block shape phones.
The shape without the word Marlboro is not Marlboro IMO . Is not the same as Maccus using Golden Arches as that is a proper representation.
I know where some of the debate is at, I am just not agreeing that this had broken copyright as there isn't any indication that this is a Marlboro car until I decal it stating it so.
Marlboro logo is the two lions and whatever is the main logo triangles and shapes are not relevant without the wording nor logo, is unfair that some one cannot paint a house with red roof and white walls and being told Marlboro owns it. Vice versa a red and white car happen to have triangular shapes is disallowed.
I know the debate is but that's Marlboro logo, I just saying it isn't without the printed words.
Also Marlboro had to ditch this shape to a barcode in their racing series.
The Ferrari team claimed the barcode was part of the car design, not an advertising message.[8] well if this is so then I claim this is part of the toy design not a smoking ad
In anyway it looks bad, not sure this will even make it to production now. Still definitely somebody had snitched this to the tobacco company.
Last edited by drifand; 14th December 2014 at 05:43 PM.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules