-
14th November 2008, 05:08 PM
#6
I have a lot of respect for Eric obviously playing a huge part in designing stacks of TF toys, but i find the terminology used on on TF Wiki a bit misleading (in saying "Toys Designed by Eric"). Specifically, this is because we have the interview with Alex Kubalsky, showing his concept sketches for Classics BB, Camaro BB and Classics Mirage. In my mind, a list of "Toys designed by Eric" should only consist of toys where he's 95% responsible.. or else there's no point providing the list really! I'm not implying Eric is trying to take credit for Alex' work, just that the TF Wiki almost makes it seem that way, so we can't really take the list on face value.
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules