Member Listing and Rankings changed

[heroic_decepticon]

I had one user listed as "World's Smallest Member" for a weekend once

surprise me this weekend

[griffin]

Transfered about 85 Legends Members into the 'active' Scout Members group. That covers the most prolific members, most of whom have been active in the last month.
Every couple months I'll transfer Members who have been fairly active here, or I might look at making it an Automatic thing when someone reaches a certain amount of posts.

[Hursticon]

Transfered about 85 Legends Members into the 'active' Scout Members group. That covers the most prolific members, most of whom have been active in the last month.
Every couple months I'll transfer Members who have been fairly active here, or I might look at making it an Automatic thing when someone reaches a certain amount of posts.

Sounds good Griffin.
I like the idea of making it automatic when someone hits a pre-determined number of posts.
Do you think that determining the frequency of posts should also have a baring?, would it be necessary considering it may take ages for some to rise in rank and/or not accurately reflect their actual contributions?
Have I worded that right?

[5FDP]

Just playing devils advocate here - I wouldn't make it automatic on the number of posts because in my view, that would just encourage board spamming for the sake of earning higher classes without actual contribution. My 2 cents worth.

[Deceptic_Optic]

.

[1AZRAEL1]

.

You make persuasive argument there Optics

[Hursticon]

Just playing devils advocate here - I wouldn't make it automatic on the number of posts because in my view, that would just encourage board spamming for the sake of earning higher classes without actual contribution. My 2 cents worth.

Wow , That was so much better worded than my question, lol, I suppose you get that when your posting at nearly 2:00am in the morning.

Griff, what 5FDP said, sorry.

.

LOL

You make persuasive argument there Optics

It's those damn Optics I tells ya!, must... overt gaze...

[Deceptic_Optic]

Wow , That was so much better worded than my question, lol, I suppose you get that when your posting at nearly 2:00am in the morning.

Griff, what 5FDP said, sorry.



LOL



It's those damn Optics I tells ya!, must... overt gaze...

lol ive been holding back on that question for a very long time now...lol im glad i had the opportunity to ask that finally and its good its out of my chest...lol

[optimus1]

I also agree - the number of posts someone makes should not be used as an indicator for their ranking/status (not everyone has access to the internet 24/7)

[5FDP]

I suppose you get that when your posting at nearly 2:00am in the morning.

There's a 2AM in the morning