That's such an enormous lie. I can't believe you'd claim that.
That's not even remotely the truth. The difference here is not a matter of philosophy towards the consumers. The idea that Tomy is somehow this wonderful benefactor and not a money-making company is ridiculous.
Hasbro and Tomy's releases have a big difference between them. Hasbro's releases are way, way, way, cheaper. They spend less money on paint aps, but as a result, their toys are *half the cost* of Tomy's releases when you compare the Yen prices to the USD prices.
So yeah, Tomy's releases have more paint, but it's not because they CARE about the consumer more. They're not graciously granting you a more G1 accurate paint job out of some desire to give you better customer satisfaction. It's not because they don't care as much about the bottom line.
It's because they make you pay for it.
Yes, they're generally more G1 accurate, but whether that's a good thing or not is entirely subjective. Objectively what it does demonstrate is that Tomy is far more conservative than Hasbro. They have a much smaller consumer base than Hasbro -- whose consumer base for Transformers is just insanely huge, so they are far more conservative in their presentation of product than Hasbro.
We have a skewed view here in Australia, because we already pay insane prices for our Transformers -- we get American release Transformers at more than twice American retail. But those toys were DESIGNED for American retail release.
Both Tomy and Hasbro are in the business of making money. They treat their products differently, but this is not a sign of how much they care.
--Jhiaxus.
(Seriously dude... I've seen this "Tomy cares more about the customers" claim made a million times and it's UTTER BULLTRIPE.)