
Originally Posted by
GoktimusPrime
The problem with Transformers that have more than one alt mode is that you invariably sacrifice the look of some modes -- the more modes you chuck in, the harder it is to get each mode looking good. Sixshot pulled it off fairly well in 1987. Then comes 1988 and we get Quickswitch... by comparison it feels like a big throwback from Sixshot. Usually we expect gimmicks to
improve with time, not worsen. Sure, 1988 was the year we saw a lot of downsizing - smaller Headmasters, smaller Targetmasters... but I dunno, I wasn't disappointed with the '88 Headmasters and Targetmasters as I was with Quickswitch. The only thing that disappointed me with the '88 Headmasters was the loss of the interchangeable tech specs meter (i.e. their stats remain the same regardless of which Nebulan you plug in). And I loved the Targetmasters... they were much cheaper carded figures (which made them a lot more affordable!) and they came with
two Nebulan guns!

Yeah, I agree. Most of the time a just a single alt mode can impinge too much on the other mode. But I never said Quickswitch was good. Just a little underrated. There are plenty of TFs with sucky alt modes, but Quicky has 5 sucky alt modes!
Springer is a classic character and has three modes, only one of which is even remotely passable (helicoptor, in case anyone is wondering) and its still pretty poor. QS's alt modes might be bad, but certainly no worse than Springer's. Or Broadside's. Or Octane's...
Of course Sixshot is better (one of the greats in my book) but I ask you: which six-changer has the most robot articulation? 

Originally Posted by
GoktimusPrime
Really? I love most of the BW line...
Me too. But there are plenty that don't and sometimes I cannot understand why. Some of the figures are just fantastic!
TF Figs of 2024:
1) Legacy Magmatron
2) Legacy Gears
3) SS102 RotB Optimus