I think that school bully video there could well be associated with wrestling as well. Which is marketted very strongly to kids anyway.

Personally I support an r rating just so that parents will perhaps look at a game and make the judgement call on whether or not to buy it. I remember being in an EB shop when some kid was looking at Madworld for the wii. The kid wanted to give it a go and the parent thinking that as it was a wii game it was kid-friendly was about to buy it. Being a community minded person, I intiated conversation and managed to swing it around to the game and its contents. Mum just assumed that as it was on the wii, it was a kids game. Luckily she put it back although junior wasn't too happy with me. She thanked me afterwards.

Almost had the same situation with a kid convincing mum to get them GTA.

I've said this before and I will probably say it again. It comes down to the parents/buyer controlling it. At the current stage of technology, In my mind, the classification board should provide us with the correct information as to what a game contains, and let us decide whether or not to play it. they only have it half correct at the moment.

I assume that when the R-Rating gets passed, then we can go about playing MK. Or the MK that comes after this one, knowing how long they have been sitting on their hands so far...

Quote Originally Posted by 5FDP View Post
In Western Australia, it is explicitly forbidden to posess or copy RC computer games. Sorry, guys, you’ve got the short straw.
Aaaw Nuts
*sniffs and cuddles up to his legally owned Megatron(s) gun form*